Assessment about the Level Of Awareness Of Specialty Services
Assessment about the Level Of Awareness Of Specialty Services
Abstract
We were able to assess the level of awareness of poverty alleviation programmed in Isabela through this study. This research focused on the economic, social, and infrastructure development of Isabela's poverty alleviation programmed. Difference tests are important because they allow for the evaluation of different programmers based on different perceptions of respondents and their profile. As part of the descriptive research, survey instruments were used for the assessment, which were carefully validated by a panel of experts.
Males over the age of 51 with two children, high school graduates, earning less than minimum wage per day, and working as farm laborer's or in agriculture-related activities dominated the respondents. According to the findings, respondents were "Aware" of the 4Ps and Infrastructure Development programmers, and "Moderately Aware" of Social Housing. Social Housing and Farm-to-Market Roads have all been "implemented" in general.
Please Visit Our Website
Introduction
There is an ongoing struggle for economic growth and development in many nations, especially in developing and developed countries due to the persistence of poverty, which is caused by a variety of interrelated factors. As a result of limited or no opportunities and choices, people living in poverty are rendered powerless in many ways. Various interconnected factors have made poverty a persistent global issue for many years. These factors keep the poor state of the people and trap them in a vicious cycle Poverty is a recurring issue in Philippine government, and it is influenced by economic, demographic, cultural, social, and political factors.
Please Visit Our Website
Conclusion
Isabela's poverty alleviation programmers such as Pandalid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps), Social Housing Program and Farm-to-Market Roads (FMR) were generally well-known, according to the assessment. There were statistically significant differences in perceptions of economic, social, and infrastructure development programmers based on respondents' profiles in some indicators for the three programmers.
Please Visit Our Website
Comments
Post a Comment